Blog 1

Application of remote sensing methods in agriculture
Summary of an article by Wójtowicz Marek et al. (2016)

In recent years, great progress has been made in remote sensing. More and more satellite or airborne methods are being used in agriculture. Remote sensing allows the user to obtain information about a system without coming into direct contact with the object. This is achieved with rays ranging from visible light to thermal infrared. The radiation which is reflected by objects is detected and evaluated. In order to be able to work with the data obtained in this way, various indexes were developed. The most frequently used index is the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) (Rouse et al. 1974). This index is calculated on the basis of the fact that a healthy plant strongly reflects light in the near infrared range, while red and green radiation is absorbed by the chlorophyll (Ayala-Silva and Beyl 2005). Remote sensing in agriculture uses three methods: ground-based, airborne and satellite-based remote sensing. 

In literature different questions are listed which can be answered with remote sensing methods. Economic risks can be estimated with yield forecasts which provide information about the expected returns (Thenkabail et al. 2002, Casa and Jones 2005). A study by Li et al. (2008) showed a linear relationship between the Ratio Vegetation Index (RVI) and nitrogen uptake in winter wheat. Others used different remote sensing methods to examine plants for disease and pest infestation, as the spectral differences between healthy and infested plants are very large (Ranjitha et al. 2014, Glaser et al. 2009, Franke and Menz (2007). Remote sensing can also be used in the fight against weeds by identifying weeds and distinguishing them from crops. (Van Evert et al. 2006, Lamb et al. 1999, Backes and Jacobi 2006).
Further analysis possibilities from this report are devoted to the assessment of the water demand of plants. These are described in more detail as they provide important information for the coming project work. The temperature of the leaf surface depends on the heat radiation and the water consumption of a plant, therefore remote sensing can be used to deduce its water requirements. If the water supply is insufficient, plants begin to wilt. This is shown by the fact that they emit more long-wave infrared rays. The CWSI index was developed to evaluate and compare such data (Jackson et al. 1981). In a study by Mogensen et al. (1996) remote sensing was used to define the start date for the irrigation of an oilseed rape plantation. They showed that there is a relationship between the relative reflectance RRI (Table 1) and the water content in the soil. Using airborne remote sensing, Champagne et al. (2003) were able to show a relationship between the biomass of a plant and the weight of water per leaf area and its Leaf Area Index LAI (Table 1). Another measure for the plant water content is the canopy water content (CWC) determined as the total amount of foliage water per unit ground area. To estimate the CWC by airborne remote sensing, various methods have been developed such as the NDWI and the NDII Index (Table 1) (Cheng et al., 2013; Colombo et al., 2008). Satellite-supported remote sensing can also be used to estimate water content. This was shown by the study by Gao (1996), who used the CWSI index for this purpose. Fensholt and Sandholt (2003) used satellite data using the SIWSI Index (Table 1) to analyze changes in vegetative water content in rice fields. Obviously, satellite images can be used to estimate the water content of large vegetation areas, which is good support for effective water management.



Through the use of remote sensing, farms can be optimised. It helps operators to react more quickly to a wide range of problems, such as weed infestation, pests, nutrient supply, economic efficiency, environmental protection, quality or water demand. The difficulties in remote sensing currently lie in the variations of the degree of reflection by solar illumination angles and the differentiation of the stress signals which can emanate from the plant. With simulation models, decision support systems and improved satellites, agricultural production management can be modernized in the future.



References

Ayala-Silva T., Beyl C.A. (2005). Changes in spectral reflectance of wheat leaves in response
to specific macronutrient deficiency. Advances in Space Research 35, 305–317.
Backes M., Jacobi J. (2006). Classification of weed patches in QuickBird images: verification
by ground truth data. EARSel – European Association of Remote Sensing
Laboratories eProceedings, EARSel, Warsaw, Poland. 
Available at: http://www.eproceedings.org/static/vol05_2/05_2_backes1.html.
Casa, R., Jones, H.G. (2005). LAI retrieval from multiangular image classification and
inversion of a ray tracing model. Remote Sensing of Environment 98, 414–428.
Cheng T., Ria.o D., Koltunov A., Whiting M.L., Ustin S.L., Rodriguez J. (2013). Detection of
diurnal variation in orchard canopy water content using MODIS/ASTER airborne
simulator (MASTER) data. Remote Sensing of Environment 132, 1–12.
Colombo R., Merom M., Marchesi A., Busetto L., Rossini M., Giardino C. (2008). Estimation
of leaf and canopy water content in poplar plantations by means of hyperspectral
indices and inverse modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment 112, 1820–1834.
Champagne C.M., Staenz K., Bannari A., McNairn H., Jean-Claude D. (2003). Validation of a
hyperspectral curve-fitting model for the estimation of plant water content of
agricultural canopies. Remote Sensing of Environment 87, 295–309.
Fensholt R., Sandholt I. (2003). Derivation of a shortwave infrared water stress index from
MODIS near- and shortwave infrared data in a semiarid environment. Remote Sensing 
of Environment 87, 111–121.
Franke J., Menz G. (2007). Multi-temporal wheat disease detection by multi-spectral remote
sensing. Precision Agriculture 8, 161–172.
Gao B.C. (1996). NDWI – A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of
vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment 58, 257–266.
Glaser J., Casas J., Copenhaver K., Mueller S. (2009). Development of a broad landscape
monitoring system using hyperspectral imagery to detect pest infestation. Proceedings 
of the First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing - Evolution in
RemoteSensing (WHISPERS), Grenoble, France.
Jackson R.D., Idso S.B., Reginato R.J., Pinter P.J. (1981). Canopy temperature as a crop water
stress indicator. Water Resources Research 17, 1133–1138.
Lamb D.W., Weedon, M. M., Rew L. J. (1999). Evaluating the accuracy of mapping weeds in
seedling crops using airborne digital imaging: Avena spp. in seedling triticale. Weed
Research 39, 481–492.
Li F., Gnyp M.L., Jia L., Miao Y., Yu Z., Koppe W., Bareth G., Chen X., Zhang F. (2008).
Estimating N status of winter wheat using a handheld spectrometer in the North China
Plain. Field Crop Research 106, 77–85.
Mogensen V.O., Jensen C.R., Mortensen G., Thage J.H., Koribidis J., Ahmed A. (1996).
Spectral reflectance index as an indicator of drought of field grown oilseed rape (Brassica
napus L.). European Journal of Agronomy 5, 125–135.
Ranjitha G., Srinivasan M.R., Rajesh A. (2014). Detection and estimation of damage caused by
Thrips Thrips tabaci (Lind) of cotton using hyperspectral radiometer. 
Agrotechnology 3, 1–5.
Rouse J.W., Haas R.H., Schell J.A., Deering D.W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in
the Great Plains with ERTS. Proceedings, 3rd Earth Resource Technology Satellite (ERTS),
Symposium 1, 48–62.
Thenkabail P.S., Smith R.B., De-Pauw E. (2002). Evaluation of narrowband and broadband
vegetation indices for determining optimal hyperspectral wavebands for agricultural
crop characterization. Photogrammetric Engineering 68, 607–621.
Van Evert F.K., Van Der Heijden G., Lotz L.A.P., Polder G., Lamaker A., De Jong A., Kuyper
M.C., Groendijk E.J.K., Neeteson J.J., Van der Zalm T. (2006). A mobile field robot with
vision-based detection of volunteer potato plants in a corn crop. 
Weed Technology 20, 853–861.
Wójtowicz M., Wójtowicz A., Piekarczyk J. (2016). Application of remote sensing
methods in agriculture. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science 11, 31–50.

Kommentare

  1. The blog gives a very good overview of the different indexes and their application possibilities. In addition, the illustration is very helpful in understanding these indexes.
    If you read the blog, you might think remote sensing wouldn't have any disadvantages. Why is remote sensing not used everywhere with unmanned aircraft systems?
    I also don't understand how to measure the water content with the NDVI index, which only gives the chlorophyll content per area. Or did I misunderstand something?

    AntwortenLöschen
    Antworten
    1. Hi Mo94

      Thank you for commenting on my blog.
      Yes, you misunderstood something: To estimate the canopy water content the NDWI index is used, it is not the same as the NDVI, which is described in the introduction. The Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) is calculated using two water absorption bands from the MODIS satellite sensor and has nothing to do with the chlorophyll of the plant.

      Best regards Joni

      Löschen
    2. Keep in mind that the NDWI is specialized on the MODIS sensor and is not easily transferable to other sensor systems.

      Löschen
  2. Hey Joni

    The your blog entry is giving a good overview of the usage and possibilities of remote sensing in agriculural industry. In your blog is not written, what project you are heading to and which of these methods you want to use or not to use. Where are the limitations of remote sensing and do you need only the data from the sensors to analyse the crops?

    It would be helpful for the readers if you place your text in a bigger context where you describe what your goal is with your blog and how the information is helping to reach it.

    greetings
    Prince Wavehair

    AntwortenLöschen
  3. Hoi jonathan,
    The material you present is well suited for your application in the field work.the summary of the different vegetation indices are of course dependent on the sensor system of the remote sensing platform but part of the indices you present will be applicable to the data we will acquire in Schinznach. Please keep in mind that we will be limited by the sensor systems we will be able to apply (the camera we get to use are either thermal, RGB optical or NirGB multispectral – in the later case Parrot Sequia and Micasense MX).
    Therefore you have to select indices in the fieldwork that are compatible with that imagery.

    The paper is well structured and the English is good. Keep in mind that your reader expect you to have read ALL the references in your reference list. If you present such a long reference list that there might be questions about their content and that you should really know whats in those papers.

    AntwortenLöschen

Kommentar veröffentlichen